Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) is a common inherited disorder of
iron metabolism, and is the most common genetic disorder in Caucasians,
with a prevalence rate of 1 in 250 reported for those of Nordic or Celtic
ancestry. However, given the genetic homogeneity of the Irish and the
Celtic ancestry, it is perhaps no surprise that the highest frequency
of C282Y alleles worldwide has been reported in the Irish population.
Data from studies performed in this country indicate that one in 80
people are C282Y homozygous; one in 25 are C282Y/H63D compound heterozygous,
and one in five carry one copy of the C282Y mutation (C282Y heterozygous).
Given the high prevalence of the disorder in this country, the silent
accumulation of iron for many decades, and the potentially life-threatening
clinical outcomes for those who remain undiagnosed, screening for the
condition and early diagnosis remain a high priority.
Genetic aspects
In 1996, a candidate gene for HH was identified, the HFE gene on chromosome
6. A single mutation in the HFE gene results in the substitution of
tyrosine for cysteine at amino acid 282, the C282Y mutation. A second
mutation in the HFE gene results in the substitution of asparate for
histidine at amino acid 63 and is termed the H63D mutation. Homozygosity
(two copies of the affected gene) for the C282Y mutation is found in
85-90 per cent of individuals of north European origin who have HH,
while the H63D mutation is found in four to per cent of patients. Compound
heterozygosity (one copy of C282Y and one copy of H63D) has been reported
in three to five per cent of published series.
Recent evidence suggests that other mutations, such as ferroportin,
may account for those individuals who have clinical evidence of iron
overload but negative genetic testing (C282Y negative, H63D negative),
as is common in northern Italy.
Clinical aspects
Clinical manifestations of HH relate to the level of iron accumulation,
which is progressive with age, and thus the condition develops in a
series of stages. Clinically insignificant accumulation occurs over
the first 20 years of life (0-5g parenchymal iron storage). This evolves
to a stage of iron overload without disease (approximately 20-40 years
of age; 10-20g iron storage), which, if left untreated, may progress
to a stage of iron overload with organ damage (older than 40 years;
>20g iron storage).
The
degree of iron overload has a direct
impact on life expectancy of the HH patient.
The major causes of death are decompensated
cirrhosis, HCC, cardiomyopathy and diabetes,
which occur at a frequency of 10-to 119-fold
higher than expected in age- and sex-matched population without HH.
However, survival is
normal in HH patients in whom treatment is
initiated before the development of cirrhosis, emphasising the importance
of early diagnosis
and treatment. The commonest presenting symptom is fatigue which affects
more than 60 per cent of patients. Other common symptoms and signs are
listed in Table 1.
However,
not all C282Y homozygotes develop clinically apparent disease. In a
population-based study of 5,000 Australians, only half of those who
were homozygous had clinical features of HH,
and 25 per cent had serum ferritin levels that remained in the normal
range over a four-year follow-up period. This suggests that clinical
expression (or phenotype) of the condition is variable and incomplete,
and that despite their genetic predisposititon to iron overload, some
HH individuals will not accumulate iron sufficient to cause end-organ
damage. Factors which influence iron absorption or accumulation are
listed in Table 2.
Increasing evidence from varying disciplines indicates that some individuals
have a greater or lesser susceptibility to develop fibrosis as a result
of liver injury (profibrogenic versus antifibrogenic genoytpe) which
may contribute to the rate of liver fibrosis and ultimately cirrhosis.
However, in the absence of readily available tests to identify this
subgroup of HH patients, it seems sensible to monitor all HH patients
for iron accumulation on a regular basis (Table 3). In addition, a four-year
period is probably insufficient to judge the rate of iron accumulation,
and longer follow-up would be needed to support the conclusion that
the clinical penetrance of the C282Y mutation is low.
Diagnosis and screening
The
diagnosis of HH is based on biochemical evidence of iron overload (elevated
serum ferritin level and serum transferrin saturation), and
where indicated, characteristic liver biopsy
findings with elevated hepatic iron levels. Measurement of transferrin
saturation (TS) is
the single best screening test. When the fasting
TS exceeds 45 per cent, TS has a sensitivity of 94 per cent and a specificity
of 94 per cent for the diagnosis of HH. Overnight fasting avoids circadian
or postprandial variations and eliminates 80 per cent of false-positive
TS results. In at least three population-based studies, a TS cutoff
value of 45 per cent identified greater than 98 per cent of homozygote
HH patients. However, fewer than half those with elevated TS values
were homozygote for HH (positive predictive value 44 per cent), reflecting
other possible diagnoses with secondary iron overload such as hepatitis
C, steatohepatitis and alcohol-induced liver injury (Table 3)
Similar results have also been reported in the Irish setting. In a
study of 330 fasting blood specimens received at the biochemistry department
at Portiuncula Hospital, a TS value of >45 per cent identified all
HH homozygotes (sensitivity 100 per cent, specificity 72.7 per cent).
The current cost of a TS evaluation is approximately _1.70. Serum ferritin,
when used alone, has positive and negative predictive values for HH
of 61 per cent and 87 per cent (where serum ferritin >300 ng/ml is
abnormal). But an elevated serum ferritin in combination with raised
TS has a negative predictive value of 97 per cent.
Thus, the message is clear: most people who are homozygous for the C282Y
mutation can be reliably detected by measuring TS and ferritin (approximate
total cost _5 per person).
This view is consistent with the conclusions of a decision-analysis
model that compared the cost effectiveness of genotyping all subjects
in a blood donor population with that of genotyping only those with
elevated TS values at time of initial screening. In one Australian study,
screening by means of fasting TS values would have averted the need
for the more expensive genotyping in almost 99 per cent of the subjects
with normal TS values after two measurements. Target populations for
screening for HH are shown in Table 4.
In the case of children of a known HH patient, genotypic analysis of
the spouse will determine the need for mutation analysis in the children.
If the spouse possesses no C282Y mutation, the children can only be
heterozygous. If the spouse is heterozygous, each offspring has a 50
per cent chance of homozygous status. As organ damage has not been documented
before adult life, evaluation can be deferred until late teens.
The question as to whether general population screening is advisable
and cost-effective is contentious. Genotypic screening (by mutation
analysis of HFE gene) would be prohibitively expensive, a concern that
may become less important as newer and less expensive technologies are
developed. Technologies such as microarray gene analysis could allow
for the simultaneous testing of a wide range of genetic mutations that
could lead to iron overload. However, there is now a wealth of data
confirming the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value
of phenotypic screening tests (TS, ferritin) to support their use as
baseline screening tools with subsequent genotypic confirmation offered
to those with abnormal iron markers.
Some patients may need liver biopsy to assess the degree of liver injury,
in particular fibrosis and cirrhosis. HH surveys in Canada and the US
have reported that women with HH with pre-treatment ferritin levels
of greater than 1000 ng/ml were three times more likely to have serious
liver disease, while men with a pre-treatment ferritin value of greater
than 1000 ng/ml were six times more likely to have significant liver
damage. As the iron burden in HH is progressive with age, those individuals
less than 40 years of age with no clinical evidence of disease (raised
ALT, hepatomegaly, etc.) with serum ferrtin values less than 1000 ng/ml
are unlikely to have significant hepatic injury. However, those with
elevated ferritin values more than 1000 ng/ml with abnormal liver enzymes,
hepatomegaly or other clinical indicators of disease, should be offered
a liver biopsy. The presence of cirrhosis stratifies those at risk for
complications of liver disease (ascites, varices, and HCC).
Treatment
The cornerstone of treatment is phlebotomy. One unit of blood (400-450mls,
equivalent to 250mg of iron) should be removed once or twice weekly
as tolerated and according to pre-venesection ferritin. In HH patients
with total iron stores of more than 30g iron, it may take 18-24 months
to adequately reduce iron levels to the desired target of 50ng/ml. Maintenance
phlebotomy to keep the serum ferritin below 50ng/ml may then be tailored
to the individual by three-to-six- monthly assessment of fasting ferritin
and TS. A strict iron deficient diet is not necessary but avoidance
of iron-rich food or beverages is sensible. In addition, vitamin C supplements
(which contain high levels of iron) should be avoided.
Dr Suzanne Norris, MRCPI, PhD,
Consultant Hepatologist,
Hepatology Centre,
St James's Hospital, Dublin 8.